Friday, August 28, 2020

Jerry vs. James: Avoid These Writing Mistakes and Persuade Like a Pro

[Editor’s note: As many of you might have heard by now, I accidentally pissed off Jerry Seinfeld earlier this week… Well, I recently came across this article about the subject. This is being reprinted from Matt Tillotson’s excellent blog. An unfortunate and painful but also unusual writing lesson. Painful for me, I have to say, but fun to read.

Check out the full article in today’s issue of The Altucher Report! If you’re not already a subscriber, click here for more information.]

Jerry vs. James: Avoid These Writing Mistakes and Persuade Like a Pro

By Matt Tillotson 

Writing prowess — and writing mistakes — were on full display in the recent kerfuffle between Jerry Seinfeld and James Altucher over New York City.

Altucher’s persuasive copywriting chops shine through in two vibrant and persuasive essays. He stoked attention and emotion with colorful analogies, insightful data, and relevant personal experiences. 

Seinfeld responded. Did his punches land? 

This is the story of a PWKO: a persuasive writing knockout

Important disclaimer: This piece is about writing persuasively and effectively. I’m not here offer any crystal-gazing about Gotham’s future. I love NYC and am rooting for it. 

Now, let’s get ready to rumble. 

Round One: The First Volley 

James Altucher started the fight with an essay entitled NYC is Dead Forever … Here’s Why.” Let’s take a look at the jabs and haymakers Altucher uses to create an essay that garners attention and generates strong reactions. 

The Bold Open 

Altucher often writes to incite raw emotion. He stakes out clear and bold positions that half his readers will hate, such as:

When Altucher writes, he doesn’t hedge his bets. Per his usual strategy, the headline for his NYC essay swirls together controversy and mystery. 

The use of “forever” in the headline is critical. Everyone knows NYC is empty right now. The streets are largely dead. “Forever” throttles up emotion and creates a bold position. The essay wouldn’t have been nearly as controversial without that single word. 

Open boldly and make every word count. 

Acknowledge and Address Skepticism 

When you make a bold claim in a headline, you must quickly address skepticism or the reader will dismiss your position and check out. Altucher wastes no time:

“But NYC always always bounces back.” No. Not this time.

“But NYC is the center of the financial universe. Opportunities will flourish here again.” Not this time. 

“NYC has experienced worse.” No it hasn’t.

Later, Altucher shares stats that further break down resistance: 

A Facebook group formed a few weeks ago that was for people who were planning a move and wanted others to talk to and ask advice from. Within two or three days it had about 10,000 members. 

Altucher then acknowledges the three most important reasons to move to NYC, and dismantles all of them:

  •   Business opportunities
  •   Culture 
  •   Food

He uses detail, anecdotes, and observations to pick apart the points of resistance to his argument. Altucher makes his case, in large part, by refuting the skeptics. 

If you open boldly, get right to work addressing the counterpoints.

For the full article, read this week’s issue of The Altucher Report.

The post Jerry vs. James: Avoid These Writing Mistakes and Persuade Like a Pro appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/2QvZlXO via website design phoenix

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

The Trick to Finding Rental Discounts in NYC

It’s not easy. But they are there. Up to 50% or more.

For several years I lived just in Airbnbs. I lived in every neighborhood of NYC. I would live for a few days or a month or a few months.

I owned no furniture. And I was probably depressed.

I didn’t want to settle down in one place. I didn’t want to have anything that was “mine.”

Then I had to get an apartment. There was an area I wanted to live but no Airbnbs were available.

That was then. Things have changed.

When you see a news headline like, “Apartment Vacancies at All-Time High!” it doesn’t mean you’ll automatically find a great deal today.

If you are just looking for yearly rentals on a real estate site, you won’t find discounts.

How come?

Landlords will work out discounts on the side like, “Get three months free but sign the lease for no discount on the rent.” In other words, 25% off.

Why would they do this?

They don’t want to be stuck with a discount to rent if there’s an eviction moratorium. They don’t want to show the data of a discount the next time they put it up for rent. Or for sale. Who knows?

Also, not every vacancy is for rent. If a building has five vacancies maybe they’ll only put up one of those vacancies. They don’t want renters to realize how many people have left the building.

Solution:

Airbnb. There’s no BS. The 400,000 people who have left NYC since March NEED to rent their places out.

They will slash and cut and kill until they rent out. And nobody will ever know.

I did a random search on just any place in NYC. This was on the first or second page of results. I’ve never seen anything like it.

What does this mean for the future? I don’t know. I don’t want Jerry Seinfeld to yell at me again.

The post The Trick to Finding Rental Discounts in NYC appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/3hKibXn via website design phoenix

Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Sorry Seinfeld: Your Love of NYC Won’t Change the Facts About Its Crisis

This article originally ran in the opinion section of The New York Post.


I’ve gotten more death threats in the past week than probably the average politician does — all because I wrote a column for The Post with the online headline “NYC Is Dead Forever: Here’s Why.” I presented facts. Plus, I told the story of my own lifelong love affair with the Big Apple and lamented its impending demise.

Now Jerry Seinfeld — sitting in the comfort and safety of his Hamptons mansion, with probably five dozen rare Italian sports cars in the garage — has written a response in the New York Times calling me a “putz” and insisting that “NYC has resilience.”

My mother agrees with him.

I appreciate that Seinfeld is also concerned enough about the city to write a rebuttal. But there’s denial, and there’s reality. Denial won’t help anything. Failing to address problems won’t save Gotham.

We all get it. New York has “grit.” I lived three blocks from Ground Zero on 9/11. I lived on Wall Street during the financial crisis and Great Recession. I was optimistic then. But let’s look at the facts — again:

  • Apartment vacancies are at an all-time high right now. That’s 13,117 vacancies. This number will rise: 1 in 4 residents haven’t paid rent since March.
  • Deficits are at all-time highs. The city is drowning in $9 billion of red ink — $1 billion more than expected. And tax revenues will see their steepest decline in city history.
  • More companies are leaving New York than ever before. They aren’t leaving because I wrote an article, but because corporations are serious about reality. Citi. JPMorgan. Google. And hundreds of other large companies. All either leaving or going remote.

Why can they go so easily? Because for the first time in history, internet bandwidth allows all or nearly all white-collar ­employees to work remotely. Back in 2008, average bandwidth was 2.5 megabits per second (not enough for video). Now it’s more like 30 megabits per second (more than enough for video).

Does this mean people like ­remote work? No. But most studies agree: Remote is more productive. Again, this isn’t my conjecture. Thousands of firms that make up New York’s tax base have concluded so.

The knock-on effects, combined with those from the needlessly protracted lockdown, are devastating.

Thousands of restaurants have shuttered their doors permanently. Yelp has said up to 50% of the restaurants it tracks are out of business. A study by Partnership for New York City found that up to one-third of Gotham’s 240,000 small businesses may never reopen.

What does this mean? It means more revenue declines and even higher deficits. It means the choking death of the tourism industry. It means eerily empty office buildings.

We are just beginning to see the beginning. The beginning! A city spokesperson said that up to 22,000 layoff notices will go out August 31. These layoffs will hit emergency workers (who risked their lives at the height of the pandemic), garbage collectors, teachers and police officers. That last group’s loss will be ­especially tragic, given the 130% increase in shootings this year.

A city can’t survive blows like this.

Nobody wants this. I don’t want it. Seinfeld doesn’t want it, though he doesn’t exactly suffer.

It’s working-class people who will bear the brunt: the dry cleaners, the deli sandwich virtuosos, the retail workers. Seinfeld and others imagine that “grit” and “resilience” are all it takes. Magical thinking is such a wonderful thing.

Let’s focus on solutions.

One solution would be a massive bailout, but that requires political will in Washington that may never materialize. Barring that, the city must create massive economic incentives for existing companies to stay and new ones to move to New York and hire people — starting by removing the massive disincentive of a prolonged lockdown. The forces of law and order mustn’t be made an enemy of.

Otherwise, New York’s (and other large cities’) opportunities will disperse throughout the rest of the country. If urban areas stay on their current trajectory, young people will find other places to flourish without having to move to cities. Gotham would lose its greatest engine of prosperity and dynamism: people.

The city we love needs help. I don’t care that Seinfeld insults me in another paper. Hey, for all the grimness of the moment, at least I inspired a once-great ­comedian to finally write some new jokes. By the way, my local business, StandupNY, is doing 50 free shows in Central Park this week. You’re welcome to perform, Jerry, but I don’t think you’re in town.

The post Sorry Seinfeld: Your Love of NYC Won’t Change the Facts About Its Crisis appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/3hyhjos via website design phoenix

Friday, August 21, 2020

Podcast Corner: A New 30-Day Book Challenge!

A New 30-Day Book Challenge Is Here!

When I launched the first 30-day book challenge, I got a lot of great feedback. So I decided to keep doing it.

If you do any of these challenges, I will retweet and talk about your book. 

Read the show notes of the episode here.

Jevon “JT” McCormick: From the Son of a Pimp to the President and CEO of Scribe Media

You probably know I’m very into self-publishing, so when the president and CEO of Scribe Media, Jevon “JT” McCormick’s new book, I Got There, came out, I had to have him on the show to talk about his life journey.

He was the son of a pimp, and now he’s the president and CEO of a major media company. He sticks to his core principle, not letting his past pull him down. 

Read the show notes of the episode here.

Don’t Stir Up So Much Trouble, Zuby!

Zuby, perhaps the nicest person on the planet, is a rapper, podcast host, author, and also, he broke the women’s world heavy-lifting record. Let him tell the story. He’s also got advice on how to go viral on social media… and he explains why he might be the calmest person on the planet. 

Read the show notes of the podcast here.

The post Podcast Corner: A New 30-Day Book Challenge! appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/2Ei8roD via website design phoenix

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

The Autobiography of My Past Two Days: A Saga of Sorrow and Hope

I didn’t expect all the hate. I’ve lost friends over this article. But, as the cliche goes, maybe they weren’t friends to begin with. Reality is better to deal with than denial. 

I was on Fox Business earlier today. I will be on Glenn Beck’s show tomorrow. There’ve been a lot of nice mentions about my article on “NYC Is Dead Forever… Here’s Why.” There were no politics in my post, so I hope people didn’t take it that way. I was just stating facts. 

I’ve also had an enormous amount of hate mail. ENORMOUS. 

Mostly people from NYC saying things like, “I hate it when people from Iowa come to NY for a week(!!!), trash it, and leave. GET THE F OUT @jaltucher!” 

I tried to respond: “I was born here. Been here all my life except for college.” But people have their biases and refuse to let go of them.

And, of course, as always, I realized it was useless to try to explain things to anonymous trolls. Only the 1,000th time I’ve learned that. 

And many people liked it, sent me messages, and I hope I did what I intended, which was provide food for thought and for solutions. And in this article, food for hope. 

But it’s also amusing to see all the specific people who decided to trash me. 

At least two family members who haven’t spoken to me in years (“He left NYC for five years! Just an opportunist!”), two people who I gave their very first jobs to (“@jaltucher is full of sh*t”), and other people who had problems with me unrelated to this article and chose this opportunity to ride the NYC-born pendulum that swung against me. 

Good luck to them. Life is short. 

My point is: Don’t shoot the messenger. I’m not making a political statement at all. Nor am I “kicking NYC while it’s down.” Far from it. I live in NY. I still own a bar/comedy club in NY. My kids go to school in NY. My family is there. My friends are there. 

But if my FACTS are correct—thousands of restaurants shut down, Midtown empty, evictions soaring to all-time highs, the greatest violence in years, etc.—it’s reasonable to ask, what’s next in life? 

I love NYC, always have, always will. And I have a family. And I have other dreams in my life. I expect I will always live in NYC one way or the other but, perhaps because of that, I take very seriously the problems that New Yorkers are facing and I have to decide whether I want to help solve those problems, or if they are even solvable. 

SOLUTIONS PEOPLE OFFERED

I found nobody offered solutions to the problems mentioned in my article other than the typical:

  • NYC still has a ways to go before it hits bottom. 
  • New leadership will be elected.
  • Rents will collapse all over the city, making NYC affordable for young people for the first time in decades. 
  • Young people will move in.
  • An energetic art scene will develop and thrive based on the new youth-based culture
  • And as a result, cafes, restaurants, culture, businesses will begin to thrive again. 

But this “solution” skips over and ignores many of the problems I outline. 

For instance, the fact that bandwidth, for the first time ever, allows people to work fully remotely. It has also allowed companies like Google, Twitter, JPMorgan, Citigroup, and many, many others to go remote indefinitely, which means that many office buildings will remain empty. 

This will damage the entire economic ecosystem that existed around the millions of workers who will now be remote (or evicted or no longer going to college campuses, etc.): the transit system, office maintenance, restaurants, etc. 

That, combined with a rising deficit and lower revenues from lower personal and corporate taxes, is a huge bridge we’re going to have to cross before there is any thriving youth culture. 

Did you know that only 2,500 people (out of eight million people in NYC) pay 40% of all the taxes that NYC collects, and that this is the main income for NYC? Well, what happens if half, or even 1/10, of those 2500 are gone, precisely when expenses are going up? 

I don’t know the answer. I only point it out. NYC will be here 10 years from now. But it will be different. 

That’s why I don’t call this period we are entering a “new normal”… I call it “The Great Reset.” 

Everything is getting reset. Everything. It’s like leaving high school and going across the country to college. You can be a new person. Make new friends. Have new passions. Explore new ideas. 

The economy is not up or down right now. It’s tilted. There is money to be made and through my books, through my podcast, through these articles, I hope to explore and share as many opportunities as possible. 

THERE IS HOPE

Everyone read my article and said, “Ugh, this makes me so sad.” I am sorry I did that to people. It was not my intent (nor was it my intent to make people angry). 

There is massive, massive HOPE that is seeded inside the words of that article. And everyone should benefit. 

Innovationism—the belief that innovation, creativity, invention powers ongoing prosperity, improves standards of living, improves equality, brings people from harsh conditions to thriving ones—is alive and well in America. 

And with the decline of the first-tier cities—LA, San Francisco, NYC, Chicago—we are going to see financial opportunity, creativite opportunity, educational opportunity, tech opportunity dispersed to every area of the country and not just two or three cities. 

We have this to look forward to in The Great Reset. 

As individuals, in this resetting era, we have more than ever to contribute.

The “frontier” of the American Dream has always been defined by geography. But with each one of us confronting our fears inside this pandemic and economic lockdown, we will find the frontier within ourselves and that is what will be explored in The Great Reset. 

For my appearance on Fox this morning, click here.

Also, please subscribe to my podcast and write a review if you can — it really helps my rankings (and makes me feel warm inside). Thanks!

The post The Autobiography of My Past Two Days: A Saga of Sorrow and Hope appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/2FEYAK1 via website design phoenix

Friday, August 14, 2020

NYC Is Dead Forever… Here’s Why

I love NYC. When I first moved to NYC, it was a dream come true. Every corner was like a theater production happening right in front of me. So much personality, so many stories. 

Every subculture I loved was in NYC. I could play chess all day and night. I could go to comedy clubs. I could start any type of business. I could meet people. I had family, friends, opportunities. No matter what happened to me, NYC was a net I could fall back on and bounce back up. 

Now it’s completely dead.

“But NYC always always bounces back.” No. Not this time.

“But NYC is the center of the financial universe. Opportunities will flourish here again.” Not this time. 

“NYC has experienced worse.” No it hasn’t. 

A Facebook group formed a few weeks ago that was for people who were planning a move and wanted others to talk to and ask advice from. Within two or three days it had about 10,000 members. 

Every day I see more and more posts, “I’ve been in NYC forever but I guess this time I have to say goodbye.” Every single day I see those posts. I’ve been screenshotting them for my scrapbook. 

Three of the most important reasons to move to NYC: 

  • Business opportunities
  • Culture 
  • Food

And, of course, friends. But if everything I say below is even 1/10 of what I think, then there won’t be as many opportunities to make friends.

A) BUSINESS

Midtown Manhattan, the center of business in NYC, is empty. Even though people can go back to work, famous office buildings like the Time-Life skyscraper are still 90% empty. Businesses have realized that they don’t need their employees at the office. 

In fact, they’ve realized they are even more productive with everyone at home. The Time-Life Building can handle 8,000 workers. Now it maybe has 500 workers back. 

(Midtown reopened, but still empty)

“What do you mean?” a friend of mine said to me when I told him Midtown should be called Ghost Town. “I’m in my office right now!” 

“What are you doing there?” 

“Packing up,” he said and laughed, “I’m shutting it down.” He works in the entertainment business. 

Another friend of mine works at a major investment bank as a managing director. Before the pandemic, he was at the office every day, sometimes working from 6 a.m.–10 p.m. 

Now he lives in Phoenix, Arizona. “As of June,” he told me, “I had never even been to Phoenix.” And then he moved there. He does all his meetings on Zoom. 

I was talking to a book editor who has been out of the city since early March. “We’ve been all working fine. I’m not sure why we would need to go back to the office.” 

One friend of mine, Derek Halpern, was convinced he’d stay. He put up a Facebook post the other day saying he might be changing his mind. Derek wrote: 

“In the last week:

 

  • I watched a homeless person lose his mind and start attacking random pedestrians. Including spitting on, throwing stuff at, and swatting.
  • I’ve seen several single parents with a child asking for money for food. And then, when someone gave them food, tossed the food right back at them.
  • I watched a man yell racist slurs at every single race of people while charging, then stopping before going too far.

 

And worse.

I’ve been living in New York City for about 10 years. It has definitely gotten worse and there’s no end in sight.

My favorite park is Madison Square Park. About a month ago a 19-year-old girl was shot and killed across the street.

I don’t think I have an answer but I do think it’s clear: it’s time to move out of NYC.

I’m not the only one who feels this way, either. In my building alone, the rent has plummeted almost 30% — more people are moving away than ever before.

So…

It’s not goodbye yet. But a lifelong New Yorker is thinking about it.”

I picked his post out but I could’ve picked from dozens of others.

People say, “NYC has been through worse,” or “NYC has always come back.” 

No and no. 

First, when has NYC been through worse?

Even in the 1970s, and through the ’80s, when NYC was going bankrupt, even when it was the crime capital of the U.S. or close to it, it was still the capital of the business world (meaning, it was the primary place young people would go to build wealth and find opportunity). It was culturally on top of its game — home to artists, theater, media, advertising, publishing. And it was probably the food capital of the U.S. 

(NYC in the ’70s)

NYC has never been locked down for five months. Not in any pandemic, war, financial crisis, never. In the middle of the polio epidemic, when little kids (including my mother) were becoming paralyzed or dying (my mother ended up with a bad leg), NYC didn’t go through this. 

This is not to say what should have been done or should not have been done. That part is over. Now we have to deal with what IS. 

In early March, many people (not me), left NYC when they felt it would provide safety from the virus and they no longer needed to go to work and all the restaurants were closed. People figured, “I’ll get out for a month or two and then come back.” 

They are all still gone. 

And then in June, during rioting and looting, a second wave of NYCers (this time including me) left. I have kids. Nothing was wrong with the protests but I was a little nervous when I saw videos of rioters after curfew trying to break into my building. 

Many people left temporarily but there were also people leaving permanently. Friends of mine moved to Nashville, Miami, Austin, Denver, Salt Lake City, Dallas, etc. 

Now a third wave of people is leaving. But they might be too late. Prices are down 30–50% on both rentals and sales no matter what real estate people tell you. And rentals are soaring in the second- and third-tier cities.

I’m temporarily, although maybe permanently, in South Florida now. I also got my place sight unseen.

Robyn was looking at listings around Miami and then she saw an area we had never been to before. We found three houses we liked. 

She called the real estate agent. Place No. 1: Just rented that morning 50% higher than the asking price. Place No. 2: Also rented (by other New Yorkers. The agent said they came from New York for three hours, saw the place, got it, and went back to pack). Place No. 3: Available. 

“We’ll take it!” The first time we physically saw it was when we flew down and moved in. 

“This is temporary, right?” I confirmed with Robyn. But… I don’t know. I’m starting to like the sun a little bit. I mean, when it’s behind the shades. And when I am in air conditioning.

But let’s move on for a second: 

Summary: Businesses are remote and they aren’t returning to the office. And it’s a death spiral — the longer offices remain empty, the longer they will remain empty. 

In 2005, a hedge fund manager was visiting my office and said, “In Manhattan you practically trip over opportunities in the street.” 

Now the streets are empty. 

B) CULTURE:

I co-own a comedy club, Standup NY, on 78th and Broadway. I’m very, very proud of the club and grateful to my fellow owners Dani Zoldan and Gabe Waldman and our manager Jon Boreamayo. It’s a great club. It’s been around since 1986 and before that it was a theater. 

One time, Henry Winkler stopped by to come on my podcast. He was the one who told me it had been a theater. 

He said, “I grew up two doors down from here and used to perform here as a kid. Then I went out to LA to be the Fonz and now I’m back here, full circle, to be on your podcast. This place has history.” Things like that happen in NYC.

(When Henry Winkler stopped by Standup NY and I got to meet the Fonz!)

In the past year, Jim Gaffigan, Jerry Seinfeld, Tracy Morgan, and many others have been on the stage. 

It’s only one step to get onstage. Jim Gaffigan fell flat on his face while he was walking up the step. The next day, on Seth Meyers’ late night show, Jim said, “I failed at the one thing you’re supposed to do — I couldn’t stand up!” 

I love the club. Before the pandemic I would perform there throughout the week in addition to many other clubs around the city and, in the past few months, clubs in Chicago, Denver, San Jose, LA, Cincinnati, all over the Netherlands, and other places. 

I miss it. 

We had a show in May. An outdoor show. Everyone socially distanced. But we were shut down by the police. I guess we were superspreading humor during a very serious time. 

The club is doing something fun: It’s doing shows outside in the park. This is a great idea. 

In a time like this, businesses need to give to the community, not complain and not take. 

That said, we have no idea when we will open. Nobody has any idea. And the longer we remain closed, the less chance we will ever reopen profitably. 

Broadway is closed until at least the spring. The Lincoln Center is closed. All the museums are closed. 

Forget about the tens of thousands of jobs lost in these cultural centers. Forget even about the millions of dollars of tourist-generated revenues lost by the closing of these centers. 

There are thousands of performers, producers, artists, and the entire ecosystem of art, theater, production, curation, that surrounds these cultural centers. People who have worked all of their lives for the right to be able to perform even once on Broadway, whose lives and careers have been put on hold. 

I get it. There was a pandemic. 

But the question now is: What happens next? And, given the uncertainty (since there is no known answer), and given the fact that people, cities, economies loathe uncertainty, we simply don’t know the answer and that’s a bad thing for New York City. 

Right now, Broadway is closed “at least until early 2021” and then there are supposed to be a series of “rolling dates” by which it will reopen. 

(The Schulman Theater on Broadway on a Friday evening)

But is that true? We simply don’t know. And what does that mean? And will it have to be only 25% capacity? Broadway shows can’t survive with that! And will performers, writers, producers, investors, lenders, stagehands, landlords, etc. wait a year? 

Same for the museums, the Lincoln Center, and the thousands of other cultural reasons millions come to New York City every year. 

The hot dog stands outside of the Lincoln Center? Finished. 

C) FOOD

My favorite restaurant is closed for good. OK, let’s go to my second favorite. Closed for good. Third favorite, closed for good. 

I thought the PPP was supposed to help. No? What about emergency relief? No. Stimulus checks? Unemployment? No and no. OK, my fourth favorite, or what about that place I always ordered delivery from? No and no. 

Around late May, I took walks and saw that many places were boarded up. OK, I thought, because the protesting was leading to looting and the restaurants were protecting themselves. They’ll be OK. 

Looking closer, I’d see the signs. For lease. For rent. For whatever. 

Before the pandemic, the average restaurant had only 16 days of cash on hand. Some had more (McDonalds), and some had less (the local mom-and-pop Greek diner). 

Yelp estimates that 60% of restaurants around the United States have closed. 

My guess is more than 60% will be closed in New York City but who knows. 

Someone said to me, “Well, people will want to come in now and start their own restaurants! There is less competition.” 

I don’t think you understand how restaurants work. 

Restaurants want other restaurants nearby. That’s why there’s one street in Manhattan (46th St. between 8th and 9th) called Restaurant Row. It’s all restaurants. That’s why there’s another street called Little India and another one called Koreatown. 

(Restaurant Row)

Restaurants happen in clusters and then people say, “Let’s go out to eat,” and even if they don’t know where they want to eat they go to the area where all the restaurants are. 

If the restaurants are no longer clustered, fewer people go out to eat (they are on the fence about where so they elect to stay home). Restaurants breed more restaurants. 

And again, what happens to all the employees who work at these restaurants? They are gone. They left New York City. Where did they go? I know a lot of people who went to Maine, Vermont, Tennessee, upstate, Indiana, etc. Back to live with their parents or live with friends or live cheaper. They are gone, and gone for good. 

And what person wakes up today and says, “I can’t wait to set up a pizza place in the location where 100,000 other pizza places just closed down.”? People are going to wait awhile and see. They want to make sure the virus is gone, or there’s a vaccine, or there’s a profitable business model. 

Or… even worse. 

D) COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

If building owners and landlords lose their prime tenants (the store fronts on the bottom floor, the offices on the middle floors, the well-to-do on the top floors, etc.) then they go out of business. 

And what happens when they go out of business? 

Nothing actually. And that’s the bad news. 

People who would have rented or bought say, “Hmmm, everyone is saying NYC is heading back to the 1970s, so even though prices might be 50% lower than they were a year ago, I think I will wait a bit more. Better safe than sorry!” 

And then with everyone waiting… prices go down further. So people see prices go down and they say, “Good thing I waited. But what happens if I wait even more?!” And they wait and then prices go down more. 

This is called a deflationary spiral. People wait. Prices go down. Nobody really wins. Because the landlords or owners go broke. Less money gets spent on the city. Nobody moves in so there is no motion in the markets. And people already owning in the area and can afford to hang on have to wait longer for a return of restaurants, services, etc. that they were used to. 

Well, will prices go down low enough everyone buys? 

Answer: Maybe. Maybe not. Some people can afford to hang on but not afford to sell. So they wait. Other people will go bankrupt and there will be litigation, which creates other problems for real estate in the area. And the big borrowers and lenders may need a bailout of some sort or face mass bankruptcy. Who knows what will happen? 

E) COLLEGES 

There are almost 600,000 college students spread out through NYC. From Columbia to NYU to Baruch, Fordham, St. John’s, etc. 

Will they require remote learning? Will kids be on campus? It turns out: a little bit of both. Some colleges are waiting a semester to decide, some are half and half, some are optional. 

But we know this: There is uncertainty and there is hybrid. I don’t know of any college fully coming back right away. 

That’s OK, you might say, so in a semester or two it might be fine. 

(Columbia University)

Not so fast. Let’s say just 100,000 of those 600,000 don’t return to school and decide not to rent an apartment in New York City. That’s a lot of apartments that will go empty. 

That’s a lot of landlords who will not be able to pay their own bills. Many bought those student apartments as a way to make a living. So now it ripples back to the landlords, to the support staff, to the banks, to the professors, etc. 

In other words, we don’t know. But it’s going to be a lot worse before it’s better. 

F) OK, OK, BUT NYC ALWAYS COMES BACK

Yes it does. I lived three blocks from Ground Zero on 9/11. Downtown, where I lived, was destroyed, but it came roaring back within two years. Such sadness and hardship and then quickly that area became the most attractive area in New York. 

And in 2008/2009, there was much suffering during the Great Recession, again much hardship, but things came roaring back. 

But… this time is different. You’re never supposed to say that but this time it’s true. If you believe this time is no different, that NYC is resilient, I hope you’re right.

I don’t benefit from saying any of this. I love NYC. I was born there. I’ve lived there forever. I STILL live there. I love everything about NYC. I want 2019 back. 

But this time is different. 

One reason: Bandwidth. 

In 2008, average bandwidth speeds were 3 megabits per second. That’s not enough for a Zoom meeting with reliable video quality. Now, it’s over 20 megabits per second. That’s more than enough for high-quality video. 

There’s a before and after. BEFORE: No remote work. AFTER: Everyone can work remotely.

The difference: bandwidth got faster. And that’s basically it. People have left New York City and have moved completely into virtual worlds. The Time-Life Building doesn’t need to fill up again. Wall Street can now stretch across every street instead of just being one building in Manhattan. 

We are officially AB: After Bandwidth. And for the entire history of NYC (the world) until now, we were BB: Before Bandwidth. 

Remote learning, remote meetings, remote offices, remote performance, remote everything. 

That’s what is different. 

Everyone has spent the past five months adapting to a new lifestyle. Nobody wants to fly across the country for a two-hour meeting when you can do it just as well on Zoom. I can go see “live comedy” on Zoom. I can take classes from the best teachers in the world for almost free online as opposed to paying $70,000 a year for a limited number of teachers who may or may not be good. 

Everyone has choices now. You can live in the music capital of Nashville, you can live in the “next Silicon Valley” of Austin. You can live in your hometown in the middle of wherever. And you can be just as productive, make the same salary, have higher quality of life with a cheaper cost to live. 

G) And what would make you come back? 

There won’t be business opportunities for years. Businesses move on. People move on. It will be cheaper for businesses to function more remotely and bandwidth is only getting faster. 

Wait for events and conferences and even meetings and maybe even office spaces to start happening in virtual realities once everyone is spread out from midtown Manhattan to all over the country. 

The quality of restaurants will start to go up in all the second- and then third-tier cities as talent and skill flow to the places that can quickly make use of them.

Ditto for cultural events. 

And then people will ask, “Wait a second, I was paying over 16% in state and city taxes and these other states and cities have little to no taxes? And I don’t have to deal with all the other headaches of NYC?” 

Because there are headaches in NYC. Lots of them. It’s just we sweep them under the table because so much else has been good there. 

NYC has a $9 billion deficit. $1 billion more than the mayor thought it was going to have. How does a city pay back its debts? The main way is aid from the state. But the state deficit just went bonkers. Then is taxes. But if 900,000 estimated jobs are lost in NYC and tens of thousands of businesses, then that means less taxes unless taxes are raised. 

(Revenue sources for NYC are all going down but the deficit is going up)

Next is tolls from the tunnels and bridges. But fewer people are commuting to work. Well, how about the city-owned colleges? Fewer people are returning to college. Well how about property taxes? More people defaulting on their properties. 

What reason will people have to go back to NYC? 

I love my life in NYC. I have friends all over NY. People I’ve known for decades. I could go out of my apartment and cross the street and there was my comedy club and I could go up onstage and perform. I could go a few minutes by Uber and meet with anyone or go play PingPong or go to a movie or go on a podcast and people traveling through could come on my podcast. 

I could go out at night to my favorite restaurants and then see my favorite performers perform. I could go to the park and play chess, see friends. I could take advantage of all this wonderful city has to offer.

No more.

The post NYC Is Dead Forever… Here’s Why appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/2E8NvQg via website design phoenix

Friday, August 7, 2020

Podcast Corner: Andrew Yang, Tucker Max and More!

Andrew Yang Saves the World

I was really nervous for this one and giddy afterward. I’ve had a thousand questions for Andrew Yang, an American entrepreneur and former presidential candidate, and he answered all of them. We talk universal basic income, behind-the-scenes details of the campaign, law enforcement, career advice, and the most frustrating parts of running for president. Plus, will he run again? 

Read the show notes for the episode here. And watch a clip below.

Tucker Max Is Back Again! (Twice in One Week!)

Part 1: Initially, I called up my good friend, Tucker Max to talk about publishing books and the industry. BUT, we got derailed right from the beginning, and started talking about all the insanity! I “Why are you being gaslit?” he asked me. I asked Tucker what he thought was going on in the world. An hour later we finished Part 1 of the podcast.

Read the show notes for the episode here.

Part 2: Once we stopped ranting about gaslighting and insanity, we finally went into our favorite topic: WRITING and self-publishing! Tucker helped me brainstorm ideas for my bestselling book, “Choose Yourself” and he is a founder of Scribe Media, a unique publishing company that has helped writers from Tiffany Haddish to David Goggins write their books. We discussed different genres… and why memoirs are the easiest to write—and often the most successful. 

“No one reads your book to learn about you, they read your book to learn about themselves. But the way they learn about themselves is through your honest and vulnerable expressions of your emotions and experience.”–Tucker Max

Read the show notes for the episode here.

Also this week:

Side Hustle Friday: How to Write a Book in 30 Days and 12 Books in a Year

Instagram Q&A: Election Delays, A Million-Dollar Idea, and 3D Thinking

The post Podcast Corner: Andrew Yang, Tucker Max and More! appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/2XEBsl0 via website design phoenix

Thursday, August 6, 2020

Everything I Needed to Know to Bet Big on This Election! (Part 2)

[Editor’s note: Check out Part 1 of this article here.]

Politics is a game of imperfect information. 

Who will win? Donald Trump or Joe Biden? 

The polls say Biden. But what are the odds they are wrong? What are the odds a debate could help or hurt Biden? What are the odds the debates are canceled? What are the odds the economy will be directionally moving down in November (a key indicator for elections)? Etc. 

I’m staying out of that bet for the moment. You can’t make a bet unless you feel you have an information edge that nobody else has. This is true for stocks also. 

If it were any other election and if the Democratic Convention were first, and if I saw the Democratic candidate surge in the “prediction market” right after the convention, then right before the Republican convention, I would bet on the Republican candidate and then take the bet off about a week after the convention ended. 

How come? Because I know the statistics on how polls change during, before, and after each convention. If the market weren’t baking that in already, I would make a bet. 

OK, enough! 

Here are my bets:

Who will be Joe Biden’s VP pick?

I’ve traded around this market quite a bit. At different times I’ve bet on Val Demmings, Tammy Duckworth, and Susan Rice. 

The favorite is Kamala Harris.

The way this betting market works is that “shares” on a particular market trade between 0 cents and 100 cents. If I bet 49 cents on Kamala Harris right now, I would make a profit of 51 cents (100 – 49) if she is selected.

That means the market is “giving me” almost 1:1 odds (slightly less at 51:49 but roughly 1:1), or about a 50% chance she is selected. 

I think, best case, those are accurate odds and there’s no edge there for me.

But hold onto this thought because I might need this knowledge in a bit.

I have two sources that I think are more informative than me. One says he is leaning toward Val Demmings. The other says Susan Rice, who he has worked with before.

I have to decide, what are the odds either of my sources have reliable information? One is not in the political game but knows people who know people who KNOW. 

The other has been in the political game for a long time. 

I go with the latter. He says, “Biden wants to have a relationship with his VP like Obama did with him. He has to have rapport, like the person and trust her. That has to be Susan Rice. He would hate Kamala.”

I pick up Susan Rice at 21 cents. She goes to 27 cents but I’m going to hold until I get more information. (I have previously traded in and out of Susan Rice but am now willing to hold for the long run). 

BUT… she’s still in second place on the market. Clearly people think Kamala has a chance. So I hedge my bet.

I don’t buy Kamala Harris at 49 cents. I buy her in a different market.

Who will win the presidency?

Kamala Harris is trading at 4 cents. 25:1 odds. For every $100 I bet I can win $2,500. 

Why is that a reasonable bet? Do I really think Kamala Harris has a 4% chance of being president in this election? 

Yes, 4%—maybe a tiny bit more. There’s about a 50% chance of her getting the VP nomination. And another market on Predictit is giving Biden a 16% chance of dropping out before 11/1, which most likely would make her the Democratic nominee in that case, and the market is giving the Democrats a 63% chance of winning the election. 

50% * 16 * 63 = about an 8% chance that the other markets on Predictit are giving Kamala for winning the presidency. 

But the actual “Who will win?” market is only giving her 4%. There’s a big difference between 8% and 4% and there’s also the fact that Biden could die before the election (these contracts are not allowed on the betting market but there’s nothing wrong with me using that possibility to adjust my odds). 

8 cents vs, 4 cents for the same outcome. Count me in for the 4-cent bet! 

And it’s a cheaper way to hedge (I only have to pay 4 cents a share) than buying shares of Kamala in the VP market. If Susan Rice gets the VP nomination I go from my initial 21 cents to 100 cents. And Kamala for president goes to 0 cents. But if Kamala gets the nomination, her odds for the presidency should realistically go to 16 cents, but will probably go to 10 cents. 

I adjust the money I bet accordingly so I can make money either way. 

What’s next? 

“Will there be 5%-plus GDP growth by 2020?”

I can bet yes or no. 

I suspect people don’t really know what this bet is about. 

Each market has rules. 

The rules for this one say: “The annual rate of increase in real gross domestic product (GDP) in one or more quarters prior to or including the fourth quarter of 2020.”

In other words, if Q3 or Q4 GDP growth is an annualized positive 5%, then I win the bet. 

It doesn’t mean “5% growth in 2020.” It just means one quarter has to have annualized growth (i.e., multiply the growth that quarter by four) greater than 5%. 

We just went down 32% in annualized GDP growth of Q2. Nobody was fooled by this. Every economist in the world expected it. And now in Q3, the Fed has pumped in stimulus, we are starting to see the effects of the congressional stimulus, plus we know they will enact a new stimulus. Plus, we can see the upticks in plane tickets, hotel visits, highway traffic, job returns, and money supply.

So it’s almost trivial to expect that GDP will grow by at least 1.25% (5% divided by four quarters) in Q3 (or Q4).

I check out my favorite economics blog: First Trust Economics by Brian Wesbury. 

Oh! He predicts 15% annualized growth in Q3. 

Good enough for me! I bet big. 

I’m a little up on it. I bet on yes at 73 cents a share. Now it’s at 84 cents but I’m holding it all the way. For me, this is a lock. I think the only edge I have here is that many investors are mostly interested in the presidential election and don’t normally read economic data so don’t know that we are talking about annualized numbers. (I hope I’m right on this but I think I am!). 

Oh, one more bet. 

Who will be the next justice to leave the Supreme Court?

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is by far the “favorite” at 74 cents a share. I put “favorite” in quotes because this one is a bit morbid. Obviously the only reason she would be first is if she dies first. 

And I do think that 74 cents, or about 3:1 odds, is about right for her. She’s in and out of the hospital. She’s not doing well. 

Ginsburg is 87 years old. The next oldest justice is Stephen Breyer at 81 years old. He is healthy and vibrant. The market is pricing him at just 6 cents (Clarence Thomas is No. 2 at 11 cents).

I figure: Breyer is 81 years old and I have no other information. According to an actuarial calculator, his odds of dying within one year is about 6.5%. But I need to factor in Ginsburg’s odds as well and the odds of the other justices. 

I bought this contract at 7 cents. Not a good bet. I have nothing to justify 7%. The correct odds are probably more like 3% and a good bet would’ve been at one or two cents.

So I gambled. Shame on me!

Still, it’s like a lottery ticket. I don’t have to risk much and I could have huge upside and I am OK with losing this bet. I bet on 7 cents and it’s currently trading at 6 cents so I’m about 14% down on my “investment.”

Don’t gamble! 

In summary, here are my current bets. NOT predictions, by the way, since I might not hold these bets until the end if they go up or down too fast. I will cash out or stop out. 

Who will win the VP nomination? Susan Rice at 21 cents (now at 30 cents but I only mention this aspect because I am in it for the long run). 

Who will win the presidency? Kamala Harris at 4 cents (I’m not predicting she wins. I’m just saying with 25:1 odds and as a hedge against the above bet and for the reasons I describe in the  article, it was a good bet for me). 

Will there be 5%-plus GDP growth in 2020? Yes at 73 cents (and I hope I’m reading the rules correctly, else I’m an idiot). 

Who will leave the Supreme Court first? Stephen Breyer at 7 cents, now trading at 6 cents. This was gambling. I should not have done it but, what the heck?

Finally, two more things about Gerolamo Cardano (see Part 1 of this essay). 

One is: He was one of the best chess players of the 1500s. For two years he did nothing but play chess all day. He said about that time, “I would never be able to express in a few words how much damage, without any compensation, [chess] caused in my domestic life.”

I know the feeling! 

He also was a believer in astrology. He predicted the exact date of his death to be September 21, 1576. 

When he was alive and well on that day he drank poison in order to make sure his prediction came true. He killed himself. I suspect he made a bet and used inside information to make sure that bet was a winner.

The post Everything I Needed to Know to Bet Big on This Election! (Part 2) appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/31vhcDe via website design phoenix

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Everything I Needed to Know to Bet Big on This Election! (Part 1)

[Editor’s note: Stay tuned tomorrow for Part 2 of this article.]

Roulette is not luck. Roulette, believe it or not, is a skill game. 

But isn’t gambling luck? Absolutely not. Putting money on “red” at the roulette table is poor skill at gambling, not luck. 

If you put $1 on red and the ball lands on red then you get your $1 back and another $1 as your “winnings.” In other words, the game was GIVING you 1:1 odds (put in $1, get back a profit of $1). 

2:1 odds means put in $1, get back $3 ($2 profit). 

This is the key to gambling, investing, and all decision making. Every decision in life. 

The casino is PAYING you 1:1 odds. But are you GETTING from the roulette table 1:1 odds. 

1:1 odds means that you have to have at least a 50% chance to win. If you have a 50% chance to win, then half the time you get $1 profit and half the time you lose the dollar you put in. In the long run, with a 50% chance to win, you will make on average $0 (you won’t win money and you won’t lose money). 

The invention of probability was entirely because people were being GIVEN odds but nobody was calculating what the actual correct odds were. 

For instance, if I am making a 1:1 bet (an even-odds bet) but I’m only going to win 25% (1 out of 4) of the time, then I am making a horrible bet. 

Let’s say I have to pick the only Ace out of 4 hidden cards. I’m only going to win 25% of the time. Let’s say the rules are that if I pick the Ace, I double my money. So $1 turns into $1 in profit and I get my original dollar back.

If I play 100 times with 25% odds then I will win (on average) 25 times (the 1 out of 4 times I guess correctly where the Ace is) and I will lose 75 times. So I make $25 but lose $75. So my net loss will be $50. 

Not because I was unlucky. But because I was stupid. 

If the game is GIVING you odds of X% (1:1 = 50%, 2:1 = 33%, etc.) then you need AT LEAST X% odds of winning in order to bet / invest. 

Why is roulette bad? Because there are four choices: red, black, 0, and 00. And if I bet  on red, the casino pays me at 1:1 odds. So I need at least 50%. But because of the 0 and 00 I only have a 47.26% chance of winning each time. 

This is how casinos make billions of dollars. Slowly but surely, I’ll win some, lose some, get on a big winning streak, a big losing streak, go to the buffett, go back and go on another losing streak, etc. Slowly but surely, the casino takes all of my money.

Every game in a casino (except poker) is set up that way. The odds are always SLIGHTLY on the casino’s side. With absolutely correct play in blackjack, you can reduce the advantage the casino has to just under 1%. That is the best bet in the casino but my guess is you don’t know perfect blackjack play. And I’ve known card counters. You and I are not card counters. 

By the way, the person who “invented” the first wearable computer was a gambler. He used a computer attached to his foot to calculate, based on where the ball was when the roulette wheel was spun, where it would end up when it landed. 

Eventually he found it too hard to make money this way (although he did make money, defying the odds… or changing them) so he switched to stocks and made millions. 

His book is excellent. “A Man for All Markets” by Ed Thorp. But you might also know him from his classic book, which has sold millions since the ’60s—“Beat the Dealer”—where he outlined for the first time the principles of card-counting in blackjack. 

Ugh! I just wanted to write an article about political bets. But first I want to explain why it’s fun and why it’s a valuable lesson about investing. 

We take it for granted that, given a casino game, we can figure out the odds of winning or losing. If we have two choices, then it’s 50%; that’s easy, right? 

Many games are a bit more complicated. But, like with most things, vice leads to innovation. 

War led to nuclear power. 

Porn fueled the rise of the internet. 

And gambling created the entire mathematical theories of statistics and probability. 

Gerolamo Cardano was a very “Choose Yourself” person. Maybe too much so but I think I would have liked him. 

First off, very vulnerable in his writings. He stated that his mother didn’t want him and tried “various abortive medicines” that obviously didn’t work. He also states that he had many illnesses as a child including “impotence.” I’m honestly curious how he arrived at that conclusion. Was it a physical thing or (my M.O. when first dating someone) psychological?

He wanted to be a doctor but couldn’t get a license in Milan, where he lived, so he moved to a small town and just started practicing medicine. He “chose himself” to be a doctor.

Only in recent society are we shamed into doing one thing in our lives. “FOCUS!” all the people who are afraid to take risks start yelling at us. But imagine the person who focused on driving horse carriages in the 1890s. He would’ve been out of a job. 

My father had a software business when I was a kid. By the time I was 12 years old, I was begging him to change his software to work on this new thing “microcomputers.” I had my first Apple II+. But he wouldn’t do it. “Mainframes aren’t going anywhere,” he said. By the time I graduated high school he was bankrupt and had a nervous breakdown. For years he cried every day. And then for the years before he passed away he sat every day and listened to music all day long. 

Cardano was not focused. Yes, a practicing doctor. But then he also became a professor of mathematics. A biologist. A chemist. An astronomer. He wrote over 200 books. I wonder if anyone ever said to him, “You can’t do that!” which is the common phrase I hear when I try to do more than one thing. 

But this is not why I bring him up. 

He was a gambler. And why not? He gambled when he practiced medicine without a license. Hopefully he didn’t cause too much damage and he was never found out. 

But with gambling, maybe he wasn’t the best at first. He was constantly losing. Constantly going broke and coming back and going broke and coming back. 

Then he said to himself, “Hmmm, maybe some math here will help me.” And it did. He basically invented the theory of probability and was the first one to write about it. He practiced his theories with dice. Both in the privacy of his home and in various gambling establishments. With probability on his side, he became very successful. 

Eventually he retired to Rome where the pope finally gave him a license to practice medicine. 

My point! Studying the odds you are given by the game versus the actual odds you come out a winner is important for success! 

With dice, roulette, even blackjack, you can calculate those odds. 

With poker slightly harder. You have to calculate not only the odds of your hand, but the odds your opponent has a better hand or (with the psychological aspect of poker) the odds your opponent is bluffing and how to factor that in.

Some games have “perfect” information. Like roulette, where you know the exact odds. Some games are imperfect (like poker). 

Life is a giant imperfect game of chance. Every decision can be a good or bad one. You have information that you know and also information that you don’t know. 

Should you plan a wedding on June 10? Yes, that seems very good. But you won’t know until that morning if it will rain, so you have to plan for it just in case. You reduce risk by taking into account all the possible events, what their probabilities are, and what the rewards/losses are for each event. 

If you plan an indoor wedding for June 10, then the loss is not much if there is a thunderstorm. But if the loss is great (in an outdoor plan), and if there’s a greater than small chance of thunderstorm, you need to plan. 

That’s how gamblers think. It’s the essence of poker. The “pot odds” have to be worth it if you want to bet, combined with the odds of whether your opponent has a better hand than the one you are trying to make.

The math in poker is much more complicated. But all the professional players know the math and take it into account on every decision. 

What about investing? The stock market is 100% a casino with imperfect information. 

For instance, let’s say Apple is going to report earnings next week. Will they be good or bad? You look up the past 100 earnings reports on Apple and you see (or your computer sees) that 50% of the time Apple went up after earnings, 50% of the time it went down. You see that when they released a new phone that quarter and exceeded expectations on phone sales, then the historical occurrences were 90 times it went up and 10 times it went down. 

And when it went up, it went up pretty big. So you are satisfied with the odds and the reward. 

BUT… how do you know if Apple will beat expectations? 

The way to gamble in a game with imperfect information is try to use other data to get more information that other gamblers in the game are not getting. 

If you just call your friend who works in Apple’s sales department and ask them, then that would be illegal insider trading. 

So you have to get more clever. You call up 100 stores and ask how many of the new phones they have left. 

If they answer “Too many!” then you know they miscalculated what the demand would be for the new phone. So many you even short the stock (bet against it). 

If the majority answer with, “We don’t have any! It’s on back-order. Should be about four weeks,” then you know that demand blew it away so Apple will exceed.

Now, you have to assume you aren’t the only one doing this sort of investigating so you start looking at message boards, calling your friends, looking at other highly profitable Apple products, etc. to get as much information as possible. 

The stock market is pricing in certain odds based on all the information collected by all the investors. If you think you have an “information edge” in this game of imperfect information, and the edge is big enough to make you think you have a 90% chance of getting the bet correct and the risk/reward is appropriate for you based on the size of your bankroll (money management being another critical part of gambling mathematics) then you make your bet. 

Phew! 

I could go on. What are the odds you should invest time in a relationship? Etc. But I really just want to describe my bets on the election betting side: Predictit.org.

Stay tuned tomorrow for Part 2 of this article.

The post Everything I Needed to Know to Bet Big on This Election! (Part 1) appeared first on James Altucher.



from James Altucher https://ift.tt/3kfKv5g via website design phoenix